Junior High School Students' Conceptual Understanding of Flat-Sided Geometric Shapes through APOS Theory: A Qualitative Study
(1) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Tangerang Raya
(2) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Tangerang Raya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Research on students' difficulties in geometry has mostly emphasized errors and formula mastery, while fewer studies have examined how junior high school students construct three-dimensional geometric concepts through APOS theory. This qualitative descriptive study analyzes eighth-grade students' conceptual understanding of cubes and prisms in flat-sided geometric shapes using the APOS framework. Participants were 28 eighth-grade students in Tangerang Regency who had studied cubes and prisms. Data were collected through five open-ended diagnostic questions mapped to Action, Process, Object, and Schema indicators and through semi-structured interviews. The results showed that 10 students (35.7%) were at the Action stage, 9 students (32.1%) at the Process stage, 6 students (21.4%) at the Object stage, and 3 students (10.8%) at the Schema stage. Most students could apply formulas but had difficulty explaining why formulas worked, coordinating two- and three-dimensional representations, and integrating base area, height, volume, and context. The novelty of this study lies in using APOS as a diagnostic framework for identifying were students' cognitive construction stalls in junior high school three-dimensional geometry. The findings suggest that geometry instruction should include visualization, manipulation, and reflective explanation to support transitions between APOS stages.
Keywords
References
Alghadari, F., Ma’ruf, A. H., & Yundayani, A. (2024). Students’ Inconsistency when Solving a Geometry Problem in Three-Dimensional Context. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v3i1.6905
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Roa Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014a). From Piaget’s Theory to APOS Theory: Reflective Abstraction in Learning Mathematics and the Historical Development of APOS Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6_2
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Roa Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014b). Mental Structures and Mechanisms: APOS Theory and the Construction of Mathematical Knowledge. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6_3
Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (1996). Students’ understanding of three-dimensional rectangular arrays of cubes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 258–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/749365
Battista, M. T., Frazee, L. M., & Winer, M. L. (2018). Analyzing the Relation Between Spatial and Geometric Reasoning for Elementary and Middle School Students. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98767-5_10
Cetintav, G., & Yilmaz, R. (2023). The Effect of Augmented Reality Technology on Middle School Students’ Mathematic Academic Achievement, Self-Regulated Learning Skills, and Motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(7), 1483–1504. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231176022
Chan, W. W. L., & Kwan, J. L. Y. (2021). Pathways to word problem solving: The mediating roles of schema construction and mathematical vocabulary. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2021.101963
Chiphambo, S. M., & Mtsi, N. (2021). Exploring Grade 8 Students’ Errors When Learning About the Surface Area of Prisms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/10994
Cui, J., Yang, F., Peng, Y., Wang, S., & Zhou, X. (2024). Differential cognitive correlates in processing symbolic and situational mathematics. Infant and Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2500
Dubinsky, E. (2001). Using a Theory of Learning in College Mathematics Courses. MSOR Connections, 1(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2001.01020010
Gilligan-Lee, K. A., Hawes, Z., & Mix, K. S. (2022). Spatial thinking as the missing piece in mathematics curricula. NPJ Science of Learning, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00128-9
Hasanah, A. N., & Yulianti, K. (2020). Error analysis in solving prism and pyramid problems. Journal of Physics:
Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032035
Jones, K. (2001). Spatial Thinking and Visualisation. Royal Society. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/38485/
Kinach, B. M. (2012). Fostering Spatial vs. Metric Understanding in Geometry. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and
Teaching PK–12, 105(7), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.5951/MATHTEACHER.105.7.0534
Kurt, G., Önel, F., & Çakıoğlu, Ö. (2023). An investigation of Middle School Students’ Spatial Reasoning Skills. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 16(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2023.319
Lakin, J. M., Wai, J., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Corwith, S., Rothschild, D., & Uttal, D. H. (2024). Spatial Thinking Across the Curriculum: Fruitfully Combining Research and Practice. Gifted Child Today. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241242722
Lavicza, Z., Abar, C. A. A. P., & Tejera, M. (2023). Spatial geometric thinking and its articulation with the visualization and manipulation of objects in 3D. Educação Matemática Pesquisa. https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2023v25i2p258-277
Lutfi, M. K., Herman, T., & A, E. C. M. (2025). Discriminant Analysis of Students ’ Spatial Ability in Understanding Flat-Sided Geometric Shapes. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 9(1), 56–71.
Lutfi, M. K., & Jupri, A. (2020a). Analysis of junior high school students’ spatial ability based on Van Hiele’s level of geometrical thinking for the topic of triangle similarity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032026
Lutfi, M. K., & Jupri, A. (2020b). Analysis of junior high school students’ spatial ability based on Van Hiele’s level of geometrical thinking for the topic of triangle similarity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032026
Lutfi, M. K., Kusumastuti, F. A., Akib, I., & Rohmawati, A. (2022). Media E-Learning Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar: Kelayakan pada Pembelajaran Daring. Edu Komputika Journal, 9(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/edukomputika.v9i2.54743
Lutfi, M. K., Kusumastuti, F. A., Akib, I., & Rohmawati, A. (2023). Media E-Learning Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar: Kelayakan pada Pembelajaran Daring. Edu Komputika Journal, 9(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/edukomputika.v9i2.54743
Lutfi, Muh. K., Cahya Mulyaning, E., & Annisa Kusumastuti, F. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Geometrical Thinking from Geometry Task Related to HOTS from PISA. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 943–952. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16020
Lutfi, Muh. K., Herman, T., & Mulyaning, E. C. (2025). Discriminant Analysis of Students’ Spatial Ability in Understanding Flat-Sided Geometric Shapes. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 9(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v9i1.98297
Lutfi, Muh. K., Mulyaning, E. C., & Kusumastuti, F. A. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Geometrical Thinking from Geometry Task Related to HOTS from PISA. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16020
Matheou Argyrou, A., & Panaoura, R. (2021). Young Students’ Ability on Understanding and Constructing Geometric Proofs. 121–133. https://doi.org/10.37256/SER.222021784
Morales Méndez, G., & Lozano Avilés, A. B. (2025). Augmented reality and GeoGebra 3D for improving spatial intelligence in teaching volumetric geometry. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 25(82). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.644051
Muhtadi, D., & Saleh, H. (2020). The Role of Progressive Mathematics in Geometry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012042
Noor, N., & Alghadari, F. (2021). Case of Actualizing Geometry Knowledge in Abstraction Thinking Level for Constructing a Figure. 8(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.17278/IJESIM.797749
Scheiner, T., & Pinto, M. M. F. (2014). Cognitive processes underlying mathematical concept construction: The missing process of structural abstraction. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 105. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED600022.pdf
Seah, R., & Horne, M. (2020). The Influence of Spatial Reasoning on Analysing About Measurement Situations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13394-020-00327-W
Setiawati, H., Juniati, D., & Khabibah, S. (2019). Student’s Geometric Thinking in Understanding Volume with Three-Dimensional Images of Cubes and Nets. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012053
Sudirman, S., Kusumah, Y. S., Martadiputra, B. A. P., & Runisah, R. (2023). Epistemological Obstacle in 3D Geometry Thinking: Representation, Spatial Structuring, and Measurement. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.34
Surif, J., Md Noor, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2012). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Problem Solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.09.671
Tan Sisman, G., & Aksu, M. (2016). A Study on Sixth Grade Students’ Misconceptions and Errors in Spatial Measurement: Length, Area, and Volume. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1293–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9642-5
Urbano-Urbano, I. F., Gaviria-Garcés, N. F., & Prada Núñez, R. (2021). Difficulties in Learning the Concept of Area and Problem Solving. Mundo Fesc, 11(S6), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.61799/2216-0388.1114
Weckbacher, L. M., & Okamoto, Y. (2018). Predictability of Visual Processes on Performance in Geometry. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.5539/JEL.V7N6P25
Wright, V., & Smith, K. (2017). Children’s schemes for anticipating the validity of nets for solids. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(3), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0219-1
Yao, X. (2022). Characterizing Learners’ Construction of Geometry Diagrams in Dynamic Geometry Environments. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v29.4.04
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v0i0.192
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Muh. Khaedir Lutfi, Endang Cahya Mulyaning A, Fitri Anisa Kusumastuti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats