Ethnomathematics and Cultural Values in Madurese Agricultural Activities: An Ethnographic Study for Contextual Mathematics Learning
(1) Department of Mathematics Education, State Islamic University of Madura, Indonesia
(2) Department of Mathematics Education, State Islamic University of Madura, Indonesia
(3) Department of Mathematics Education, State Islamic University of Madura, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to explore and describe the manifestation of ethnomathematics concepts and cultural values contained in the rice farming activities of the Madurese community in Bangkalan and Pamekasan Regencies. This study uses a qualitative approach with an ethnographic design. Data were collected through observation and in-depth interviews with farmers and farm laborers. Data analysis was conducted interactively using the Miles and Huberman model, which includes the stages of data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing, with triangulation techniques as a guarantee of data validity. The research findings indicate the presence of significant mathematical concepts, including counting and calculating activities. Furthermore, the application of the concept of comparison and the system of linear equations and inequalities was found. Culturally, this agricultural activity is based on the tradition of mutual cooperation and a strong philosophy of selfless work, which is reflected in the terms dherrebbhan and urunan. These values are rooted in the principles of equal-average-equal-feeling and equal-high-equal-low, which strengthen social cohesion. This study concludes that integrating ethnomathematics into mathematics instruction in schools can serve as a contextual and cooperative learning tool. This strategy not only helps students understand abstract concepts through agrarian realities but also internalizes the dimensions of the Pancasila Student Profile based on Madurese local wisdom.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdulrachman, S., Karsono, S., Samaullah, M. Y., Sembiring, H., Effendi, B. S., Dirdjoseputro, A., & Noor, E. S. (2011). Prosedur Operasional Standar (POS) Budi Daya Padi Sawah. Kementerian Pertanian.
Afni, N. & Hartono. (2020). Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) as a Strategy to Improve Students Mathematical Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012043
Aulia, L., & Rista, L. (2019). Identifikasi Konsep Matematika Melalui Aktivitas Etnomatematika Petani Sawah. JUDIKA EDUCATION: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v2i2.857
Banoet, M. R., Dominikus, W. S., & Nenohai, J. M. H. (2022). Etnomatematika dalam Aktivitas Berladang Masyarakat di Kecamatan Tobu dan Integrasinya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Fraktal: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 43–51.
Burkhardt, H. (2008). U. D’Ambrosio (2006). Ethnomathematics: Link Between Traditions and Modernity. ZDM, 40(6), 1033–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0163-3
Cahyanto, I. D., & Prabawati, M. N. (2019). Kontruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers, 274–280.
Fadlilah, U., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2015). Identifikasi Aktivitas Etnomatematika Petani Padi pada Masyarakat Jawa di Desa Setail. Kadikma, 6(3), 45–56.
Firdiansyah, A. L., Fausi, M., & Hidayati, A. L. (2024). Artifacts Exploration of the Sumenep Great Mosque through Ethnomathematics for Mathematics and Social Learning. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i2.18584
Firdiansyah, A. L., & Fausi, Moh. (2023). Matematika dalam Masjid Agung Sumenep. Duta Media.
Jamilah. (2017). Peluang Budidaya Tanaman Padi Sebagai Penyedia Beras dan Pakan Ternak Menunjang Kedaulatan Pangan. Penerbit Deepublish.
Kautsar, F., Aqib, A. M., Sari, A. P., & Sholikhah, A. (2021). Identifikasi Konsep Matematika Melalui Eksplorasi Etnomatematika pada Aktivitas Petani Padi Kecamatan Ampelgading. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pekalongan, 2, 19–28.
Kemendikbud. (2024, May). Profil Pelajar Pancasila – Ruang Kolaborasi Mengajar Merdeka. https://pusatinformasi.kolaborasi.kemdikbud.go.id/hc/id/articles/4942840129305-Profil-Pelajar-Pancasila
Kementan. (2024, May 14). Mentan Minta Pulau Madura Jadi Kekuatan Swasembada dan Lumbung Pangan Dunia. Pertanian.Go.Id. https://www.pertanian.go.id/
Koentjaraningrat. (2004). Kebudayaan, Mentalitas, dan Pembangunan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Laksono, A. D., Pranata, S., & Astuti, W. D. (2014). Positioning Dukun Bayi, Studi Kasus Upaya Penurunan Kematian Ibu dan Anak di Kabupaten Sampang. Penerbit Kanisius.
Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Refika Aditama.
Mansur, F. A., Arsyad, & Manaf, A. (2023). Analysis of The Aiken Index to Measure The Content Validity of The Wolio Language and Culture Preservation Model Instrument. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(3), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i3.29667
Moleong, L. J. (1988). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosda.
Muhtadi, D., Sukirwan, S., Warsito, W., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Sundanese Ethnomathematics: Mathematical Activities in Estimating, Measuring, and Making Patterns. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.4055.185-198
Noppitasari, N., Riyadi, & Budiharto, T. (2023). Implementasi Profil Pelajar Pancasila Dimensi Gotong Royong dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas IV di Sekolah Dasar. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 11(5), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v11i6.77729
Pratama, L. D., & Lestari, W. (2017). Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Petani dalam Lingkup Masyarakat Jawa. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2, 91–97.
Risdiyanti, I., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2020). Ethnomathematics (Teori dan Implementasinya: Suatu Pengantar). UAD Press.
Romadhona, A. R., Prameita, A. E. D., Alvianita, M., Adha, E. A. W., & Iffah, J. D. N. (2023). Analisis Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMA Budi Utomo Perak. Laplace : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.31537/laplace.v6i1.1097
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2011). Ethnomathematics: The Cultural Aspects of Mathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 4(2), 32–54.
Saputro, M. N. A., & Pakpahan, P. L. (2021). Mengukur Keefektifan Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. JOEAI: Journal of Education and Instruction, 4(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v4i1.2151
Sihotang, A. P. (2008). Ilmu Sosial Budaya Dasar (ISBD). Semarang University Press.
Wati, H. D. (2022). Penerapan Pengendalian Hama Terpadu (PHT) dalam Meningkatkan Pendapatan
Petani Padi di Desa Sindir Kecamatan Lenteng Kabupaten Sumenep. Jurnal Pertanian Cemara, 19(2), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.24929/fp.v19i2.2235
Webb, D. C., Van Der Kooij, H., & Geist, M. R. (2011). Design Research in the Netherlands: Introducing Logarithms Using Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematics Education at
Teachers College, 2(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.7916/JMETC.V2I1.708
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v9i1.180
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Adin Lazuardy Firdiansyah, Lusiyana Dewi, Nur Hasanah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
