Mathematical Reasoning Based on Gender: Mapping The Literature By Bibliometric Analysis
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the literature review based on the analytic database on google scholar about mathematical reasoning related to gender. A total of 200 papers on mathematical reasoning were published in the harzing data base from 1959 to 2021 and analyzed through a bibliometric analysis approach. Aggregation of bibliographies from sources, authors, countries, institutions, publications and co-occurrence of authors' keywords were analyzed and visualized through VOSViewer software. Mathematical reasoning is heavily influenced by other things, one of which is related to gender differences in it. The results from the bibliometric data of the Harzing Application and VOSViewer that there is a distribution related to mathematical reasoning is very closely related to the key words difference, mathematical reasoning ability, reasoning, reasoning ability, mathematical ability, boy, girl, female, and male. The journal that has a lot of research on mathematical reasoning based on gender is the Journal of Educational Psychology, an institution that researches a lot on mathematical reasoning based on gender is the American Psychological Association. And the country that has researched the most on mathematical reasoning is the United States.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Battey, D. (2013). “Good” mathematics teaching for students of color and those in poverty: The importance of relational interactions within instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 125–144.
Burais, L., Ikhsan, M., & Duskri, M. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa melalui Model Discovery Learning. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 3(1), 77–86.
Coronata, C., & Alsina, Á. (2014). Evaluation of the mathematical processes in the practices of teaching and learning in childhood education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1320–1323.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2013). Rationality and reasoning. Psychology Press.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., & Fischer, M. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45.
Gurian, M. (2010). Boys and girls learn differently! A guide for teachers and parents. John Wiley & Sons.
Hidayat, R. A., WAHYUDİN, W., JAİLANİ, J., & SETİADİ, B. R. (2020). Improving elementary students’ mathematical reasoning abilities through sociohumanistic-based learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1457–1469.
Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584
Jäder, J., Sidenvall, J., & Sumpter, L. (2017). Students’ mathematical reasoning and beliefs in non-routine task solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 759–776.
Joung, E., & Byun, J. (2021). Content analysis of digital mathematics games based on the NCTM content and process standards: an exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, 121(3), 127–142.
Kadarisma, G., Nurjaman, A., Sari, I. P., & Amelia, R. (2019). Gender and mathematical reasoning ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042109
Koutraki, M., Teschke, O., Sack, H., Müller, F., & Bannister, A. (2017). Leveraging Mathematical Subject Information to Enhance Bibliometric Data. The 1st International Workshop on Scientometrics and 1st International Workshop on Enabling Decentralised Scholarly Communication.
Maarif, S. (2016). Improving Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Analogical Ability Using Discovery Learning Method. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 114–124.
Maarif, S., Wahyudin, W., Alyani, F., & Pradipta, T. R. (2020). Kemampuan Mengkonstruksi Bukti Geometri Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Pada Perkuliahan Geometri. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2012
Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 70–89.
Maoto, S., Masha, K., & Mokwana, L. (2018). Teachers’ learning and assessing of mathematical processes with emphasis on representations, reasoning and proof. Pythagoras, 39(1), 1–10.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell‐Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347.
Rahayu, N. S., Liddini, U. H., & Maarif, S. (2022). Berpikir Kreatif Matematis : Sebuah Pemetaan Literatur dengan Analisis Bibliometri Menggunakan Vos Viewer Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 11, 179–190.
Rahmat, R., Ikhsan, M., & Zubainur, C. M. (2019). Penikatakan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Madrasah Aliyah Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw. Jurnal Peluang2, 7(1), 1–12.
Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G. W., Hughes, E. M., & Fries, K. M. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 235–252.
Salmina, M., & Nisa, S. K. (2018). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Gender Pada Materi Geometri. Numeracy : Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 41–48.
Schünemann, H. J., Vist, G. E., Higgins, J. P. T., Santesso, N., Deeks, J. J., Glasziou, P., Akl, E. A., Guyatt, G. H., & Group, C. Grade. M. (2019). Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 403–431). Wiley Online Library.
Sidenvall, J., Lithner, J., & Jäder, J. (2015). Students’ reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 533–552.
Rodiah, S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas IX MTS Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Gender. 3(April), 1–8.
Sumpter, L. (2013). Themes and interplay of beliefs in mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1115–1135.
Trisnawati, A. (2018). Tren Topik Skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Perpustakaan Di Perpustakaan Fakultas Adab Dan Humaniora UIN Alauddin Makassar Periode 2004-2016 (Sebuah Kajian Bibliometrik). Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 2016.
Wheatley, G. H. (2013). Reasoning with images in mathematical activity. In Mathematical reasoning (pp. 289–306). Routledge.
Widodo, S. A., Irfan, M., Trisniawati, T., Hidayat, W., Perbowo, K. S., Noto, M. S., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2020). Process of algebra problem-solving in formal student. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012092
Widodo, Sri Adi, Cahyani, E. R., & Istiqomah, I. (2020). Single Subject Research: Learning Algebra Operations in Introverted Students. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(2).
Widodo, Sri Adi, Istiqomah, Leonard, Nayazik, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2019). Formal student thinking in mathematical problem-solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012087
Yuni, Y., & Suryana, A. (2020). Open-Ended Problems for Junior High School Student’s Mathematical Reasoning. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 3(2), 88–99.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v5i2.1
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Afifah Afifah, samsul Maarif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats